[ROM][KK][4.4][2014-05-18] CyanogenMod 11.0

[Medina]

Great news! Did you find what is the cause for the echo?

Sent from my MI 2 using Tapatalk 2

 

[M1cha]

not yet

 

[linuxx]

nice wallpaper

if u want it: http://imageshack.com/a/img826/7586/28ue.png

your build time is very fast btw I need 50-70 min

The normal time is about 40 minutes, but now pc went out of ram (I tryed 2 times once it fail with same error last time), second it works, but get out of ram.... Can u tell me how to push this rom aviable for ota
@everyone Uploaded on dev host!!!1

not yet

I don't have this bug at all

 

[M1cha]

just give me the download link

 

[linuxx]

just give me the download link

i have dropbox only @ the moment, I'm importing it on d-h.st
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s...AHpFk2j2bfLp3_-f1ARbBpAGJazNNqhCSLdC8aE_2IbiQ

 

[M1cha]

there's a error in the zip. CWM can't verify the whole-file signature

 

[linuxx]

there's a error in the zip. CWM can't verify the whole-file signature

Sign it via https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=kellinwood.zipsigner2

Inviato dal mio Nexus 7 utilizzando Tapatalk

 

[M1cha]

@linuxx WTF? the zip's are automatically signed by the build system.

 

[linuxx]

@linuxx WTF? the zip's are automatically signed by the build system.

:\... Yes, but when it's not working i try this app, haven't flashed yet...

Inviato dal mio Nexus 7 utilizzando Tapatalk

 

[linuxx]

@linuxx WTF? the zip's are automatically signed by the build system.

It works ad well, just tryed, it only ask if u want to installato untrust package

Inviato dal mio Nexus 7 utilizzando Tapatalk

 

[M1cha]

Sry but you really have a big problem. Either you modify the zip before uploading or there are integrity problems.
The final zip produced by the build system is signed with testkeys and CWM checks the signature against test-keys.

If you sign a corrupted file to flash it u'll run into big trouble.

 

[linuxx]

Sry but you really have a big problem. Either you modify the zip before uploading or there are integrity problems.
The final zip produced by the build system is signed with testkeys and CWM checks the signature against test-keys.

If you sign a corrupted file to flash it u'll run into big trouble.

I'm running it now... Don't have any problems only thing is that recovery asked me if i wanted to flash a untrusted package, select yes... Nothing else..... I'll upload another one (*-ota_package-*.zip, same rom as the one i uploaded...) I only change build.prop file and i changed data cuz it told me 4 Jan 2014....(i did this with the other build top...) strange...

Inviato dal mio MI 2(s) utilizzando Tapatalk

 

[M1cha]

changing the build.prop is what's causing this problem.
You shouldn't change anything in the zip.

and otapackage zip is the wrong file.
cm-* is the correct one.

 

[Gooners]

Hey guys!

It seems, for me, that the battery drains very very fast while screen is on. Do you have the same problem?
While screen is off it's rather good though. What gouvernor is best for battery (except powersave) on demand? interactive?

Seems the phone gets very hot to, while screen is on

 

[Sterver]

I'm using only one core on 1 GHz (if I don't need them - tapatalk, calls, sms, web) so battery is good for me (not best) . Interactive is more battery saver as ondemand. Ondemand is something between performance and interactive in battery drain. (obly my tought, maybe I'm wrong).
And battery performance is not optimized well in CM 11, but it is not so horrible.


Ok, I found this http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2017715 so I was wrong. Read that, it can be useful.

 

[RobinHood00]

I'm using only one core on 1 GHz

How did you do that? Could you give a small step by step? Or using paulrlz guide?

Never mind.

 

[linuxx]

changing the build.prop is what's causing this problem.
You shouldn't change anything in the zip.

and otapackage zip is the wrong file.
cm-* is the correct one.

OK today I'll make new build, it just took 12 minutes and d-h.st server yesterday where gone.... :/

I'm using only one core on 1 GHz (if I don't need them - tapatalk, calls, sms, web) so battery is good for me (not best) . Interactive is more battery saver as ondemand. Ondemand is something between performance and interactive in battery drain. (obly my tought, maybe I'm wrong).
And battery performance is not optimized well in CM 11, but it is not so horrible.
Ok, I found this http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2017715 so I was wrong. Read that, it can be useful.

How did u disable cores if cm kernel doesn't support hotplug??????

Inviato dal mio MI 2(s) utilizzando Tapatalk

 

[Sterver]

I quietly used paulrlu guide, but I only delete MPDecision and use Kernel Tuner.

 

[leon28]

problem with audio and micro in xiaomi m2s 16gb. Compilation day 3 january

Enviado desde mi MI 2 mediante Tapatalk

 

[Sterver]

How did u disable cores if cm kernel doesn't support hotplug??????

Inviato dal mio MI 2(s) utilizzando Tapatalk

Only via Kernel Tuner and without MPDecision. It shows, that only CPU0 is running and Usemon too...
Screenshot took week ago.

 

[M1cha]

why your cpu always is on 1.7ghz?

 

[Sterver]

why your cpu always is on 1.7ghz?

Because this was while multitasking...

 

[espaciosalter20]

Lol... I just realize that you have two threads open for cm11... Why?... Maybe it's better to focus only in one thread or maybe make the other one just for development and bug tracking... Two threads for talking about the same ROM releases, bugs, development things it's kind of confusing... Just my 2 cents...

Enviado desde mi MI 2 mediante Tapatalk

 

[jianggau]

Lol... I just realize that you have two threads open for cm11... Why?... Maybe it's better to focus only in one thread or maybe make the other one just for development and bug tracking... Two threads for talking about the same ROM releases, bugs, development things it's kind of confusing... Just my 2 cents...

Enviado desde mi MI 2 mediante Tapatalk

No the same owner. One by M1cha , other by linuxx.

 

[linuxx]

Lol... I just realize that you have two threads open for cm11... Why?... Maybe it's better to focus only in one thread or maybe make the other one just for development and bug tracking... Two threads for talking about the same ROM releases, bugs, development things it's kind of confusing... Just my 2 cents...

Enviado desde mi MI 2 mediante Tapatalk

Yes, why not @M1cha we don't merge ours therad? We can use this