Aosp 4.4 KitKat ROM AOSP by ivan
- Thread starter linuxx
- Start date
manohar
Members
- Jun 6, 2013
- 904
- 80
Yep, it is 3.4.10 kernel. Both AOSP & CodeAurora ROM by Ivan is based on this Kernel.
Hello,
I'm an advanced user and i have tested many roms for long time with my MI2S-32GB. Ivan AOSP roms are very stable compared to CM11 and Mokee. This last one is very fast (Antutu 26800 like MIUI) and battery saving. For my use, actually, i don't have bugs or FC. Wait and see ;o)
I'm an advanced user and i have tested many roms for long time with my MI2S-32GB. Ivan AOSP roms are very stable compared to CM11 and Mokee. This last one is very fast (Antutu 26800 like MIUI) and battery saving. For my use, actually, i don't have bugs or FC. Wait and see ;o)
manohar
Members
- Jun 6, 2013
- 904
- 80
How is the Battery life bro ? any detailed testing done by you especially ? i would love to see your results of these research !
Legacyleader
Members
- Apr 16, 2011
- 35
- 18
Battery Life is pretty good i had about 2d and 1h with 2h 50 Screen Time i make a Screen next time
RobinHood00
Members
- Oct 28, 2013
- 449
- 67
Im gonna install this rom today, so expect some results in the weekend
But Im guessing it will be the same as 4.4.2 or mybe better!
cbpbxecmecmbeh
Members
- Sep 19, 2013
- 390
- 52
RobinHood00
Members
- Oct 28, 2013
- 449
- 67
That would mean battery life is about the same. One thing that I like is that this rom feels much more responsive and smoother then the 4.4.2 rom from Ivan. Maybe it's just me, but I kinda get that feeling
RobinHood00
Members
- Oct 28, 2013
- 449
- 67
As promised, screenshots after a few days. Maybe a bit better then 4.4.2... anyway, it really does the job, and 10% left
With 2000MAH battery, 4+ hours of screen on time is great for more then 2 days of use!
With 2000MAH battery, 4+ hours of screen on time is great
for more then 2 days of use!
paulrlz
Members
- Nov 23, 2013
- 584
- 82
cbpbxecmecmbeh
Members
- Sep 19, 2013
- 390
- 52
There's ~4.5MB OTA (developer version) update.
Edit: the mobile version of Tapatalk cannot insert images (or I don't know how to do it)...
Edit2: I haven't looked for a changelog
![ATTACH]](http://[ATTACH=full]8504[/ATTACH])
Edit: the mobile version of Tapatalk cannot insert images (or I don't know how to do it)...
Edit2: I haven't looked for a changelog
Last edited:
manohar
Members
- Jun 6, 2013
- 904
- 80
It is having a signature verification error. Some BasicDreams.apk file has unexpected contents.... hence flashing aborted is the error message i am getting...There's ~4.5MB OTA (developer version) update.
View attachment 8504
Edit: the mobile version of Tapatalk cannot insert images (or I don't know how to do it)...
Edit2: I haven't looked for a changelog
Anyone successfully tried updating to this OTA ?
cbpbxecmecmbeh
Members
- Sep 19, 2013
- 390
- 52
I had to flash the whole aurora again (dirty) because Provisions.apk was with an "unexpected" content (aka missing from /system/app/ and i didn't delete it) and then when i transfered only that apk from the original .zip something was wrong with a .so file... Anyways, flashed original, then update consecutively in CWM. No idea of a changelog yet...
manohar
Members
- Jun 6, 2013
- 904
- 80
cbpbxecmecmbeh
Members
- Sep 19, 2013
- 390
- 52
manohar
Members
- Jun 6, 2013
- 904
- 80
Can you describe the steps in brief for me on how to install the update ?Yes, as the screenshot indicates
By the way, what difference you found out in the update so far ?
Ivan usually release complete rom with changelog on friday
In fact,you had better flash the whole rom
In fact,you had better flash the whole rom
cbpbxecmecmbeh
Members
- Sep 19, 2013
- 390
- 52
@manohar, there are no special steps in the procedure. I am surprized that no one else managed to flash it. Anyway, I agree and we should simply wait for Friday as @Doublemark suggests.
P.S.: I don't really see a difference with the previous version, and since there's no changelog I can't guess where it should be noticeable. Battery life seems the same.
P.S.: I don't really see a difference with the previous version, and since there's no changelog I can't guess where it should be noticeable. Battery life seems the same.
First bug for me, on Security -> APPS Permission is unstable and FC "Settings" (Beautiful Widgets for example)
Similar threads
